W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdwig@w3.org > April 2020

Re: Another Call for Consensus - Time Aggregates

From: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:42:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMTVsu=QODOjvYNv__V9XN7V1QR90GoHEvzuwAKx_yE=21Mrkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
Cc: public-sdwig <public-sdwig@w3.org>, Simon Cox <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>, Scott Simmons <ssimmons@ogc.org>, "Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk)" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> 
Just to add my support for this release.

It looks very useful and I probably have some applications for it already.

Bill

On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 07:42, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
wrote:

> Dear group,
>
>
>
> As requested in https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1173 this is a Call for
> Consensus to release the temporal-aggregates extension for OWL-Time
> <https://w3c.github.io/sdw/time-aggregates/> as a W3C Interest Group Note
> and as an OGC Discussion paper.
>
>
>
> The Editor’s Draft of the Note is here:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/time-aggregates/
> Extensions to the OWL-Time Ontology - temporal aggregates
>
> OGC doc nr 20-022
>
>
>
> Please let us know if you have any concerns by Friday 1st May 2020.
>
> Silence is considered consent.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Linda van den Brink
>
> SDWIG Chair
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2020 16:42:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:02 UTC