RE: [sdw] Formalise release of SDWWG W3C notes as OGC discussion papers (#1174)

Scott, Linda, George,

As an aside, no charter for a Coverage JSON SWG was put forward as the WCS SWG Co-Chairs offered to host the work, as they viewed it as being within scope of their existing Charter. I do still have a draft charter on the shelf if required.

Chris

From: Scott Simmons <ssimmons@ogc.org>
Sent: 14 April 2020 17:43
To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
Cc: George Percivall <gpercivall@ogc.org>; public-sdwig <public-sdwig@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [sdw] Formalise release of SDWWG W3C notes as OGC discussion papers (#1174)

No motion has been made to have CovJSON as a Discussion Paper.


On Apr 14, 2020, at 7:54 AM, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl<mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>> wrote:

The motion indicated by George was related to CovJSON, but not the one I’m looking for. The W3C Note about CoverageJSON was never published as an OGC Discussion paper, as was the intention. Was there ever a motion proposing to do that?

Van: Scott Simmons <ssimmons@ogc.org<mailto:ssimmons@ogc.org>>
Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2020 14:32
Aan: George Percivall <gpercivall@ogc.org<mailto:gpercivall@ogc.org>>
CC: Scott Simmons via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org<mailto:sysbot+gh@w3.org>>; public-sdwig <public-sdwig@w3.org<mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>>
Onderwerp: Re: [sdw] Formalise release of SDWWG W3C notes as OGC discussion papers (#1174)

Yes, and there is a GitHub repo for the effort, but no charter for a SWG yet.

Scott



On Apr 14, 2020, at 6:18 AM, George Percivall <gpercivall@ogc.org<mailto:gpercivall@ogc.org>> wrote:

This motion was approved in the Singapore TC, Feb 2019:

•The Met Ocean DWG recommends that the OGC Technical Committee approve the development of a charter to establish a SWG to progress Coverage JSON to an OGC Implementation Standard.

     *   Coverage JSON fits the ISO concept but being schema-less, not completely WCS2.1/CIS1.1 compatible

     *   Motion: Don Sullivan, NASA

     *   Second: Chris Little, UK Met Office

     *   Discussion: the originator and implementer of the proposal (Jon Blower, Reading University) is willing to be involved in the process, but not take a lead. The NetCDF community also involved in using CoverageJSON .

     *   NOTUC There was no objection to unanimous consent





On Apr 14, 2020, at 8:03 AM, Scott Simmons via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org<mailto:sysbot+gh@w3.org>> wrote:

@lvdbrink yes, a motion from SDWIG is sufficient as it is an OGC subcommittee

--
GitHub Notification of comment by ogcscotts
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1174#issuecomment-613402118 using your GitHub account


Keep up with all the OGC news by signing up to our quarterly newsletter at http://newsletter.opengeospatial.org<http://newsletter.opengeospatial.org/>

Interested in attending the next OGC Technical and Planning Committee Meeting? Find out more at http://www.ogcmeet.org<http://www.ogcmeet.org/>


Keep up with all the OGC news by signing up to our quarterly newsletter at http://newsletter.opengeospatial.org<http://newsletter.opengeospatial.org/>

Interested in attending the next OGC Technical and Planning Committee Meeting? Find out more at http://www.ogcmeet.org<http://www.ogcmeet.org/>


Keep up with all the OGC news by signing up to our quarterly newsletter at http://newsletter.opengeospatial.org<http://newsletter.opengeospatial.org/>

Interested in attending the next OGC Technical and Planning Committee Meeting? Find out more at http://www.ogcmeet.org<http://www.ogcmeet.org/>