- From: Jeremy Tandy via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 11:50:37 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
During the SDW-IG teleconference on 16-Jan (minutes: www.w3.org/2019/01/16-sdw-minutes.html) we said: > OWL Space proposal > brinkwoman: I was talking with Jo yesterday about that. Sometimes, people referred to the idea as spatial ontology. Jo joined me as co-chair of the OGC GeoSemantic Working Group. > <jtandy> (Related to the previous item - we’ll all try to review the API Guidelines by the beginning of Feb - we’ll coordinate the input via the SDW group discussion) > brinkwoman: We wanted to move the topic to the Geosemantic Working Group. A Domain Working Group from an OGC perspective, which is open to non OGC people. > jtandy: That sounds fine with me. It would also give some focus to the Geosemantic Working Group. > josephabhayaratna: Having a working group plan to work on it seems a good thing. > <josephabhayaratna> +1 > <jtandy> +1 > <billroberts> +1 > <RobSmith_> +1 > billroberts: Sounds like a good idea. We discussed in the best practices some of the things missing from GeoSparql. I would concentrate on the simple bits as far as practical. > … My general feeling about using ontologies is that most people don't care about the fancy bits. If we can standardize the core things, then that's good. > josephabhayaratna: Just to follow up. Driving it from work that is already happening. Trying to keep it focused and relevant. > … Having a look at problems that people really have. We want to bring people that are struggling with concrete problems. > <billroberts> sounds like the ideal approach to me, Jo - thanks > jtandy: Linda or Jo, if you can take an action to update the issue and point people at the right OGC group, that would be good > josephabhayaratna: Happy to take that action. > brinkwoman: Should we create a proper project for it? > jtandy: Yes, move it to a concrete project > So - it looks like we have some concrete proposals, with endorsement from the IG. Actions / decisions: 1. Pursue this work within the OGC Geosemantics DWG - it's a DWG, so it's open to non-OGC members 2. Create a new Project for this activity in the SDW repo @jabhay - would you be the best person to own this push it forward? -- GitHub Notification of comment by 6a6d74 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1095#issuecomment-470496781 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2019 11:50:38 UTC