W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdwig@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [sdw] Draft W3C note with additional temporal relations (#1139)

From: elf Pavlik via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 19:24:27 +0000
To: public-sdwig@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-513492888-1563650666-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> @ashepherd I'm inclined to make this a separate note to the one on this issue - rather different scope. Wouldn't want one to hold up the other and get conversations too tangled.

:+1: while this draft just fills in some missing relations which don't imply `time:ProperInterval`, mentioned `time:TemporalAggregate` sounds like a new feature which can have independent note and process of working on it

> @elf-pavlik Could you generate some examples to show why these new relations are useful?
Preferable with some accompanying explanation so they could be dropped into Section 4. in the draft.

I plan to work on it in upcoming week, mostly examples with statements about future where one doesn't know yet if some of related temporal entities will get recorded as `time:Instant` (eg. just with `time:inXSDTimeDateStamp` information) or as `time:ProperInterval`with some more specific relations that implies it.

GitHub Notification of comment by elf-pavlik
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1139#issuecomment-513492888 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 20 July 2019 19:24:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:01 UTC