- From: Adam Shepherd via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 10:08:21 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
Hi Jano, I haven’t used OWL-Time extensively. Do you a see a situation where the order would be useful to explicitly state so as not to rely on sorting the date/time values themselves? Cheers, Adam > On Jul 20, 2019, at 3:05 AM, kjano <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > Just one brief comment. The solution below would not preserve the order > of the aggregates directly (e.g., compared to a list). > > Best, > Jano > > On 7/20/19 1:56 AM, Adam Shepherd wrote: > > > > Hey folks, there's a group of data repositories interested in > > publishing a temporal extent that expresses a seasonal coverage across > > multiple years. Rather, they want to express that data was collected > > in an aggregate of multiple intervals. > > > > The use case for an extension to OWL-Time for this case is driven by > > search precision and recall. For example if the data were collected in > > June, July and August across the years 2012 to 2015, a temporal > > interval extending from 2012 to 2015 would hit as a match for a search > > looking for data between January 2013 and May 2013 which would be > > wrong in this case. > > > > In discussions with @dr-shorthair <https://github.com/dr-shorthair> , > > he recommended a small extension of one class and one property: > > > > |time:TemporalAggregate rdf:subClassOf time:TemporalEntity . > > time:hasMember a owl:ObjectProperty; rdfs:domain > > time:TemporalAggregate ; rdfs:range time:TemporalEntity . | > > > > With this aggregate class, we can express a collection of Temporal > > entities that explicitly describes the collection activity. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > — > > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > > <https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1139?email_source=notifications&email_token=AANMP5QIWANR772LIX244Q3QAJIENA5CNFSM4IDSVW62YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD2NBLZI#issuecomment-513414629>, > > or mute the thread > > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANMP5S5VFGPWRDVP64XGQ3QAJIENANCNFSM4IDSVW6Q>. > > > > -- > Krzysztof Janowicz > > Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara > 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 > > Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu > Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ > Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ashepherd Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1139#issuecomment-513454844 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 20 July 2019 10:08:23 UTC