- From: Scott Simmons <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 09:38:10 -0700
- To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Cc: "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, "Little, Chris" <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, public-sdwig@w3.org, Simon Cox <simon.cox@csiro.au>
I strongly support no divergence. If we do not want to address the comment now, the OGC vote can proceed with the document as-is (which is the intent unless we collectively want to also proceed with a revision/erratum in W3C). Scott > On Jan 10, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote: > > Actually, Scott created a GitHub issue with Roger's feedback: > https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1114 > ... which I have now added to the Time Ontology Amendments project. > > Looking at it from a W3C perspective, if the update is deemed needed and editorial in essence, the group can publish an erratum. Following that publication, the IG may also request publication of a revised Recommendation that incorporates the erratum. If the update is considered normative, things will be a bit more complex, but nothing's impossible... I favor avoiding divergence between the OGC and W3C versions in any case. > > Francois. > > >> From: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> >> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 3:49 PM >> >> Hi Chris - >> >> I don't think there's a W3C/SDW GitHub issue open for this yet? >> >> Please could you open an issue, referencing the emails from Roger Lott et al >> so that all the information is in one place? Add this issue to the Time >> Ontology Amendments project (https://github.com/w3c/sdw/projects/5). >> >> Thanks, Jeremy >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk> >> Sent: 10 January 2019 13:28 >> To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; 'public- >> sdwig@w3.org' <public-sdwig@w3.org>; Tandy, Jeremy >> <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>; Simon Cox (simon.cox@csiro.au) >> <simon.cox@csiro.au> >> Cc: Francois Daoust (fd@w3.org) <fd@w3.org>; 'Jeremy Tandy' >> <jtandy@wmo.int>; Rushforth, Peter (NRCan/RNCan) >> <peter.rushforth@canada.ca>; sa-takagi@kddi.com >> Subject: RE: SDWIG activities >> >> Linda, Jeremy, SDWIG Members, >> >> The W3C OWL-time ontology was issued for public comment as an OGC >> standard, and there have been some suggestions for changes to the OGC >> document. I would like a short discussion on the way forward. E.g. whether >> to accept informative changes or normative, appetite for a corrigendum, >> divergence or not of OGC and W3C documents, etc? >> >> Chris >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rushforth, Peter (NRCan/RNCan) <peter.rushforth@canada.ca> >> Sent: 09 January 2019 15:14 >> To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; sa-takagi@kddi.com; >> 'public-sdwig@w3.org' <public-sdwig@w3.org> >> Cc: Francois Daoust (fd@w3.org) <fd@w3.org>; 'Jeremy Tandy' >> <jtandy@wmo.int> >> Subject: RE: SDWIG activities >> >> Hi Linda and Satoru, >> >> In the coming months I plan to evaluate if the composite quadtree tiling >> scheme invented by Satoru will integrate well with the MapML approach >> (which is based on 'regular' tiling / coordinate systems). I am optimistic that if >> we approach it in the spirit of intending to make it work, it will work and very >> well. This (composite quadtree tiling in SVG) being a geospatial concept >> developed by a W3C member using W3C technology, I think represents an >> excellent opportunity to prove the value of collaboration between the W3C >> and OGC membership. >> >> Thanks, >> Peter >> >> >> Peter Rushforth >> >> Technology Advisor >> Canada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observation Natural Resources Canada >> / Government of Canada peter.rushforth@canada.ca / Tel: 613-759-7915 >> >> Conseiller technique >> Centre canadien de cartographie et d’observation de la Terre Ressources >> naturelles Canada / Gouvernement du Canada peter.rushforth@canada.ca / >> Tél: 613-759-7915 >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> >>> Sent: January 9, 2019 2:33 AM >>> To: sa-takagi@kddi.com; 'public-sdwig@w3.org' <public-sdwig@w3.org> >>> Cc: Francois Daoust (fd@w3.org) <fd@w3.org>; 'Jeremy Tandy' >>> <jtandy@wmo.int> >>> Subject: RE: SDWIG activities >>> >>> Thank you Satoru, I had missed that issue you posted in the >>> web-roadmaps repo. It sounds relevant! >>> >>> @SDWIG members, is anyone in this group willing to check this out and >>> see if it should be added to the SDW roadmap? >>> >>> Linda >>> >>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >>> Van: sa-takagi@kddi.com <sa-takagi@kddi.com> >>> Verzonden: woensdag 9 januari 2019 02:27 >>> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; 'public- >>> sdwig@w3.org' <public-sdwig@w3.org> >>> CC: Francois Daoust (fd@w3.org) <fd@w3.org>; 'Jeremy Tandy' >>> <jtandy@wmo.int> >>> Onderwerp: RE: SDWIG activities >>> >>> Hi, >>> I posted an issue to OGC-Web-API-Guidelines about term of tiling >>> https://github.com/opengeospatial/OGC-Web-API-Guidelines/issues/32 >>> >>> And related posts are >>> https://discourse.wicg.io/t/vector-tiling-on-svgmap/3135 >>> https://github.com/w3c/web-roadmaps/issues/322 >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Satoru >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 7:52 PM >>> To: 'public-sdwig@w3.org' <public-sdwig@w3.org> >>> Cc: Francois Daoust (fd@w3.org) <fd@w3.org>; 'Jeremy Tandy' >>> <jtandy@wmo.int> >>> Subject: SDWIG activities >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> >>> I wish every member of this group a very happy 2019! Both >>> standards-wise and in your personal lives, of course. >>> >>> >>> >>> We have not singled this week out as a ‘focus week’, but we might as >>> well use it as such – at least I’m using it as an excuse to look at >>> the group’s activities. >>> >>> >>> >>> First of all I’d like to suggest we have a group telecon some time in January. >>> I’ll coordinate with Jeremy and François to come up with a time slot. Topics: >>> >>> * To solicit feedback on some work I’ve done on the SDW roadmap in >>> December >>> * To coordinate work on a formal response on CityGML v3 raising >>> technical concerns to be sent to the tc-discuss OGC list (issue 1069) >>> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1069 >>> * To settle on dates + locations for the f2f meetings in 2019. Basically >>> the choice is between: >>> >>> * Last week of February at OGC meeting in Singapore + 16-20 >>> September at W3C TPAC in Fukuoka, Japan >>> * 24-28 June at OGC meeting in Leuven, Belgium + 16-20 >>> September at W3C TPAC in Fukuoka, Japan >>> >>> * To coordinate review of the OGC Architecture Board’s API Guidelines >>> https://github.com/opengeospatial/OGC-Web-API-Guidelines >>> * To coordinate what to do with comments received on eo-qb doc (see >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdwig/2018Nov/0094.html) >>> * To discuss OWL Space idea (should we move this one to the strategy >>> funnel? Move discussion to OGC GeoSemantics DWG?) >>> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1095 >>> * Short updates on SDWIG projects >>> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/projects >>> <https://github.com/w3c/sdw/projects> >>> >>> Maybe not all of these can fit in one telecon, but that also depends >>> on how much we let the discussion drift into details. It’s my >>> intention to avoid that when we can. >>> >>> Please respond if you have other topics you want to discuss! >>> >>> >>> >>> Here’s an overview of what I have observed to be going on in SDWIG lately: >>> >>> * Rob has continued work on WebVMT; this is progressing. >>> * Nicholas Car (CSIRO, also active in DXWG) has posted some >>> suggestions for a new GeoSPARQL version. >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdwig/2019Jan/0007.html >>> * Ingo Simonis is asking the SDWIG group if we think someone from >>> OGC staff should attend the Workshop on Web Standardization for Graph >>> Data (the one Dave Raggett is organising this March) >>> * People are apparently working with EO-QB because some issues >> have >>> popped up. We have no active group members who were involved in this >>> document, however we should discuss what to do with these issues. >>> >>> * https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1110 >>> * https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1108 >>> * Also a comment + PR about use of the SWEET ontology in this >>> document https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1103 >>> >>> * The DXWG asks our review and feedback on the Profiles ontology: >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdwig/2019Jan/0000.html >>> * We have new members (both invited experts, via OGC, Natural >>> Resources Canada): >>> >>> * Joost van Ulden >>> * Tom Kradalis - interested in helping on items relevant to >>> weather services implementation, dataset search discovery, and CovJSON. >>> >>> * Nothing to report on our other work items as far as I know. >>> >>> Linda > > >
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2019 16:38:36 UTC