- From: Rob Smith via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:16:07 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
rjksmith has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/sdw: == WebVMT: Review design relationship with WebVTT == @tidoust wrote: I'm not entirely clear about design decisions following discussions at TPAC on whether to use WebVTT as: 1. **container format**, WebVMT being a type of WebVTT metadata track, 2. **base format**, WebVMT extending WebVTT, or 3. **placeholder**, pending a generic metadata file format that could perhaps follow a different syntax in the end. Personally, I would go with 1. to start with and pursue 3., but the current document seems to use 2. I wasn't part of TPAC discussions though! Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1097 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:16:09 UTC