- From: ogcscotts via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 12:20:39 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
I agree with Clemens. Perhaps this group should be split into two categories: 1. those standards which are not webby enough (i.e., need modernization to fully support current web architectures) and 2. those standards which could have web-friendly implementations (i.e., encodings more friendly to developers, such as JSON, or profiles that simplify the content for non-expert use cases). Many of the OGC W*S standards fit in the first category, many of the traditional encoding standards in the second (e.g., CityGML >> CityJSON, Moving Features CSV >> Moving Features JSON Best Practices). It sounds counter-intuitive that "Web Something Service" is less "webby" than a standard without "web" in the name, but I cannot think of a better way to describe the problem than with "webby." -- GitHub Notification of comment by ogcscotts Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1057#issuecomment-411385720 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2018 12:20:54 UTC