Thanks Nick
we will take this on board at the next SDW/SOSA meeting - all are welcome
to participate to discuss this. Just drop me an email and I'll add you to
access the rolling minutes with connection details.
IMHO the SWG proposing this implies a commitment to run regular meetings
open to W3C members of the group, I think we just need to confirm that the
GeoSPARQL SWG and CRS SWG group arrangements in place for these to fulfil
this role.
The logistics issue to determine is whether the Respec document template is
to be used. Ideally something like pyLODE could be used to produce respec
and metanorma friendly content.
Rob Atkinson
*Senior Research Engineer * | Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
Mobile: +61 419 202973
ratkinson@ogc.org | ogc.org | @opengeospatial
Sign up for OGC News
<https://ogc.us4.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=704e02f81107a6caab1568067&id=4e4528fd9d>
On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 5:15 AM Nicholas Car <nick@kurrawong.ai> wrote:
> Dear SDW WG,
>
> The OGC's GeoSemantics DWG and GeoSPARQL & CRS Ontology SWGs request that
> the SDW WG publish the next version of GeoSPARQL and the first version of
> the CRS Ontology as joint W3c/OGC standards.
>
> To this end, we have created a Pull Request to add those publications to
> the SDW WG's Draft Charter: https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/pull/565
> .
>
> Our reasoning for this request is given in description of the PR.
>
> Please could you review this request and provide feedback either on the PR
> or directly to the GeoSemantics DWG at GeoSemWeb@lists.ogc.org
>
> Regards, Nicholas Car
> GeoSPARQL SWG member & SDW WG member
> on behalf of the GeoSemantics DWG
>
>