Re: Readying the draft for publication (Re: Call for consensus: OWL Time )

Hello Simon,

On 2022-11-08 20:59, Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) wrote:
> Thanks Bert -
> 
> I'm looking at the broken links
> 
> - I find no problem with http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/109/2/j92cur.pdf - does the W3C checker not like PDF or http? - I've reinstated the reference

I get a 404 when I try from MIT or from my office at ERCIM, but it works 
OK from my home network. Strange. Maybe a configuration error at NIST. 
Anyway, that's good enough for this publication.

> 
> - indeed, the reference.data.gov.uk service appears to be no more. So much for linked data.
> 
> ** Linda, Jeremy - are you aware of anything similar to  http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/quarter/2006-Q1available, else the whole example may have to be scrapped. **
> 
> On security and privacy - I've added a two-sentence section which hand-balls the problem to the application developer.

Thanks!



Bert
-- 
   Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/

   http://www.w3.org/people/bos                               W3C/ERCIM
   bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
   +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2022 23:29:01 UTC