Re: Final releases of Best Practices, EO-QB and QB4ST published

Can we use locale-based content negotiation - and have the link to the
normative document in the translation?

Anyway - keep me posted as to your audience, feedback, needs for QB4ST as
its on the roadmap for OGC going forward but not yet tied to a specific
activity. I'd be available to help members test, refine and update - though
we all need to better understand here how OGC approaches best dovetail into
W3C processes. (My guess is a Testbed, Pilot or Interoperability Experiment
would provide an Engineering Report and a candidate spec version, and we'd
then go to W3C to have this form the basis for a limited life WG charter.
There may be a more efficient way of having the WG and OGC activities
co-exist though. It all comes down to stakeholders willing and able to
commit resources to in-depth revision and implementations.

Rob Atkinson

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 at 18:38 Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Lars,
>
> > From: Svensson, Lars [mailto:L.Svensson@dnb.de]
> > Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 9:23 AM
> >
> > Thanks Francois!
> >
> > On Thursday, September 28, 2017 3:24 PM, Francois Daoust
> > [mailto:fd@w3.org] wrote:
> >
> > > - QB4ST: RDF Data Cube extensions for spatio-temporal components
> > > https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/NOTE-qb4st-20170928/
> > > https://www.w3.org/qb4st/
> >
> > I'm still working on a Swedish translation of this QB4ST (not as easy as
> Phil
> > and I might have thought since there's lot of unfamiliar terminology in
> that
> > document!). Will it be possible to update the document after its
> publication,
> > too?
>
> Not really, no. The published version of the document should be considered
> frozen. What kind of updates did you have in mind?
>
> If the goal is to add a link to the translation, that should be doable.
> I'm not exactly sure how (Recommendations have a link to translations by
> default, but Notes do not), but I'm sure we'll find a way. It's always good
> to be able to point to translations of documents!
>
> Note that we do not publish translations in the https://www.w3.org/TR/
> space, so it will have to be published somewhere else.
>
>
> >
> > > As a side note, the Time Ontology and SSN specs are still at the
> Proposed
> > > Recommendation stage and under review by W3C Membership until 5
> > October.
> >
> > To my knowledge, our AC Rep has already voted in favour of the
> publication
> > as recommendations.
>
> I confirm he did, thanks!
>
> Francois.
>
>
>