W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > June 2017

Re: FW: BP vote at OGC

From: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:12:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMTVsumXSXvJDQNYxTt-5ppSgf5003XkeEqKLiGCyiew1ygQQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
Cc: "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Hi Linda - regarding presenting the coverages work, I saw in another mail
that Rob is planning to be at the OGC meeting and so could perhaps do it in
person.  Rob - would you be willing to summarise the SDW coverages work for
the OGC?

Bill

On 14 June 2017 at 12:10, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
wrote:

> Hi Bill,
>
>
>
> Would you perhaps be willing to present this WG’s Coverages work at the
> OGC meeting? (You could do this remotely). Otherwise, do you have
> suggestions on who else could do it?
>
>
>
> Linda
>
>
>
> *Van:* Joshua Lieberman [mailto:jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com]
> *Verzonden:* maandag 12 juni 2017 22:58
> *Aan:* Linda van den Brink
> *CC:* Scott Simmons; Clemens Portele; SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)
> *Onderwerp:* Re: BP vote at OGC
>
>
>
> Here is my suggestion for an agenda for the Geosem session. Presenters
> invited for any of the sections.
>
>
>
> –Best Practice
> –OWL-Time
> –SOSA-SSN
> –Coverages
> –Next steps
>
>
>
> --Josh
>
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 10:25 AM, Linda van den Brink <
> l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote:
>
>
>
> Okay good, so I will make some slides & give a short presentation at the
> opening plenary about the BP.
>
>
>
> Can someone do the same for OWL Time, or make a slide or two about it and
> instruct me what to say about that?
>
>
>
> I can also do a longer presentation about the BP at the GeoSemantics DWG.
> But I need someone to lead a discussion on OWL Time since I’ve not followed
> it closely at all.
>
>
>
> Clemens, could you check if a presentation is welcome in the future
> directions session and the Architecture DWG?
>
>
>
> *Van:* Scott Simmons [mailto:ssimmons@opengeospatial.org
> <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>]
> *Verzonden:* maandag 12 juni 2017 15:23
> *Aan:* Linda van den Brink
> *CC:* Joshua Lieberman; Clemens Portele; SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)
> *Onderwerp:* Re: BP vote at OGC
>
>
>
> I agree - I wil give you a slot in the opening!
>
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 7:16 AM, Linda van den Brink <
> l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote:
>
>
>
> I could do either. Perhaps, in this case the opening plenary is better
> since people will then have all week to ask me questions after.
>
>
>
> *Van:* Scott Simmons [mailto:ssimmons@opengeospatial.org
> <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>]
> *Verzonden:* maandag 12 juni 2017 13:41
> *Aan:* Joshua Lieberman
> *CC:* Clemens Portele; Linda van den Brink; SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)
> *Onderwerp:* Re: BP vote at OGC
>
>
>
> Linda,
>
>
>
> I can give you time to present briefly in the Opening or Closing Plenary.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 5:10 AM, Joshua Lieberman <
> jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> The Geosemantics session is specifically for SDW docs and discussion,
> although I won't be able to be there in person.
>
> --Josh Lieberman
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 6:39 AM, Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-
> instruments.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Linda, all,
>
>
>
> I will also be in St John’s and could support.
>
>
>
> In my view we should focus on the ones that are on pending documents in
> the OGC portal and where OGC members are voting on or formally reviewing a
> document, i.e. the BP (under TC vote) and the Time Ontology (as Simon sent
> a request for implementation input to the TC and an RFC is in preparation).
>
>
>
> Regarding the slots, in addition to the TC plenaries and the open OAB
> session, another option could be the "future directions" session, but this
> may depend on what is planned for that session (no information on the
> agenda yet). The Architecture DWG (for the BP) and the GeoSemWeb DWG (for
> both) may also be candidates, if we think that we should address specific
> DWGs in addition to the plenaries.
>
>
>
> Clemens
>
>
>
> On 8. Jun 2017, at 14:00, Linda van den Brink <L.vandenBrink@geonovum.nl>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> For the OGC folks among us.
>
>
>
> The BP is currently subject of an electronic vote among OGC TC members. In
> order to get enough members to vote and thus get quorum and get the BP
> published as an OGC Best Practice, we should bring the BP vote to the
> attention of the membership at the upcoming OGC meeting (which takes place
> in two weeks’ time @ St John, New Foundland).
>
>
>
> A few questions:
>
> - Is it only the BP we should be lobbying about, or other products of this
> WG as well?
>
> - Which OGC groups should we target e.g. for a short presentation?
>
> - Who will be in St John to help with this? (I will be there)
>
>
>
> Linda
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 June 2017 12:13:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:33 UTC