- From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:24:18 +0000
- To: <fd@w3.org>, <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>
- CC: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Yes - that looks like a typo in the document. The TTL file has time:second max 1, as did the definition of :DateTimeDescription in the 2006 version where this was taken (generalized) from. I've fixed it in the repo. -----Original Message----- From: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org] Sent: Tuesday, 31 January, 2017 03:41 To: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>; 'Chris Little' <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk> Cc: public-sdw-wg@w3.org Subject: OWL-Time - why "time:second exactly 1" for time:GeneralDateTimeDescription? [sending again with the right mailing-list address...] Hello Simon, Chris, Reviewing the Time Ontology in preparation for publication, I stumbled upon the definition of "time:GeneralDateTimeDescription", which has a "time:second exactly 1" constraint: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/#time:GeneralDateTimeDescription Am I right to think that it is a typo and that the constraint should rather be "time:second max 1" as for the other components? Or is it intended? But then, why are seconds required? Thanks, Francois
Received on Monday, 30 January 2017 21:25:22 UTC