- From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:42:37 +0000
- To: "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Simon, all, On Thursday, December 22, 2016 6:37 AM, Simon.Cox@csiro.au [mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au] wrote: > The Editors draft of the OWL-Time specification can be considered for release as a > second public working draft. > http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/ I use the time after today's super-short meeting to make some very minor comments on this very concise and informative document: cudos to the editors! 1) time:before has domain and range time:TemporalEntity which time:after doesn't. I guess that time:after should have domain and range, too. 2) There is a typo in the URI given in the OWL-2 reference [1]. The text is ok, but the href says http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/owl2-quick-reference/#Built-in_Datatypes . I think that should be http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-quick-reference/#Built-in_Datatypes 3) Regarding ISSUE-125 and backward compatibility with OWL-1, there was a mail from Antoine Zimmermann where he said: "The standard Web Ontology Language is now OWL 2. Let us forget about OWL 1" [2]. So I think it should be safe to update the spec to use xsd:dateTimeStamp. [1] https://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/#OWL-2 [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Nov/0069.html Best, Lars
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2017 20:43:23 UTC