W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > August 2017

Re: Call for Consensus: request publication of Time Ontology in OWL as Proposed Recommendation

From: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:15:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMTVsumNCZELsSdm-BDHHXJu=1y_cpX2qfOJuPGLMKq9gMZcuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Cc: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>, Scott Simmons <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>, "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, "Little, Chris" <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>
Thanks Francois - I support this going forward to Proposed Recommendation

On 17 August 2017 at 09:02, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote:

> Hello Spatial Data on the Web Working Group participants,
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to request publication of the current
> Editor's Draft of the Time Ontology in OWL specification as a W3C Proposed
> Recommendation (PR).
> The staged PR snapshot is at:
> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/time?specStatus=PR;previousMaturity=CR;
> previousPublishDate=2017-06-06;publishDate=2017-08-31;
> prEnd=2017-09-29;crEnd=2017-07-04;implementationReportURI=
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/OWL_Time_Ontology_adoption
> Goal is to keep features that had been identified as being at risk, even
> though these features are not yet widely implemented, because there is some
> evidence of early adoption for these features and because these features
> are needed for the ontology to cater for all possible use cases.
> The only change introduced since publication as a Candidate Recommendation
> was to fix the prov alignment.
> The Status of This Document section will be adjusted as needed before
> publication, in particular to replace the note on features at risk with a
> short paragraph that explains why these features are being preserved. The
> "exit criteria" section will also be removed.
> Please let us know if you have any concerns by next Thursday 24 August
> 2017. Silence is considered consent.
> Actual publication of the Proposed Recommendation would happen one or two
> weeks after the end of this call for consensus, provided it is successful
> and provided the W3C Director approves the publication.
> Scott, I do not know whether there are things required from an OGC
> perspective for that transition to happen. I let you chime in as needed!
> Thanks,
> Francois,
> W3C team contact
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2017 17:15:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:33 UTC