RE: OWL-Time ready to go - except for styling issues?

> From: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 10:12 AM
[...]

> Note the sentence that talks about features at risk should appear in the
> Status of This Document section, not in a separate appendix. Perhaps
> something along the lines of "The :MonthOfYear class and the :monthOfYear,
> :hasXSDDuration, and :hasTime properties were included recently in
> response to comments received on the ontology. They are marked as
> features at risk".

Please ignore the previous note. I see that's already done in the pull request you prepared.

Francois.

Received on Friday, 28 April 2017 08:14:26 UTC