- From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:43:06 +0000
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, Scott Simmons <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
- Message-ID: <CADtUq_2xMsOT2OPtVakT4t9jmxeCoDoN5ivSpSpPn9Utx_KYtg@mail.gmail.com>
[Scott, François / Phil - I'm looking to you to 'approve' the new schedule, in that it meets with the milestones needed for OGC and W3C] As happens from time to time, timescales for deliverables sometimes get delayed. Unfortunately, this was the case for the anticipated BP WD release (scheduled for a vote tomorrow; 26-April). Apologies, my fault. There's still quite a lot to do this sprint! Linda and I have come up with a new timeline for BP release: - Monday 8-May: freeze document (work finished on this sprint) - Wednesday 10-May: WG vote to release* Then from Scott's email [1] the following dates are taken: - Friday 12-May: webinar** to present Best Practices to Technical Committee (TC) - Sunday 14-May: start TC recommendation vote (45 days) - Friday 30-Jun: Planning Committee (PC) approval at face-to-face meeting in St. John’s Clearly our revised timetable squeezes the time between vote to release and the TC webinar - but I don't see an issue with that. Please advise if you feel otherwise. Regarding the TC webinar - I ask for support from OAB members who have been involved in the BP work (Josh- I'm thinking that you have been more involved with the BP stuff than Chris?) to ensure that we're delivering the right message to the TC. Please. We editors anticipate a further set of purely editorial changes, fixing typos, getting consistent style etc. following this vote to release. I am assuming we can make these changes while the TC recommendation vote is on-going and release a revised version at the end? * the call on 10-May is scheduled as a BP sub-group call, which would nominally occur at 15:00UTC. So- we can either vote by correspondence, -OR- we could reschedule the call to 20:00UTC to make participation/voting easier for our Australian colleagues (albeit an early start). PLEASE ADVISE ON YOUR PREFERENCE: vote by correspondence or change the time. ** Scott: what do you envisage for this webinar? Just an overview of the key points; aims and structure of the doc? I guess that the TC have 45 days before the vote closes, so there's plenty of time to read after the WG vote to release. Regards, Jeremy & Linda [1]: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Mar/0240.html
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 14:43:52 UTC