ISSUE-156 - RE: Question related to revision of OWL-Time

I've had feedback that :hasDateTimeInterval is heavily used in PeriodO, so I propose to un-deprecate this property and :DateTimeInterval (the class it is associated with). However, :xsd:dateTime still looks pretty hopeless to me, so that will stay deprecated. 

Will now close this issue. 

Simon 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Shaw [mailto:ryanshaw@unc.edu] 
Sent: Friday, 7 April, 2017 06:27
To: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Subject: Re: Question related to revision of OWL-Time

Hello Simon,

I took a look at the latest draft today and noticed that time:hasDateTimeDescription has been deprecated. What is the recommended way to link an instance of time:ProperInterval to an instance of time:DateTimeDescription? We currently use time:hasDateTimeDescription quite heavily in PeriodO:
http://perio.do/technical-overview/#temporal-extent


Cheers,
Ryan


On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:16 PM,  <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> wrote:
> Raphael, Ryan - this is very helpful and prompt feedback. Much appreciated.
> I will poke around in UK Archives and see what I can find.
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
> Simon J D Cox
> Research Scientist
> Land and Water
> CSIRO
> E simon.cox@csiro.au T +61 3 9545 2365 M +61 403 302 672
>    Physical: Reception Central, Bayview Avenue, Clayton, Vic 3168
>    Deliveries: Gate 3, Normanby Road, Clayton, Vic 3168
>    Postal: Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Vic 3169 
> people.csiro.au/C/S/Simon-Cox
> orcid.org/0000-0002-3884-3420
> researchgate.net/profile/Simon_Cox3
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
> Sent: Thursday, 6 April 2017 6:58 AM
> To: Ryan Shaw; Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton)
> Subject: Re: Question related to revision of OWL-Time
>
>> The UK Archives Hub and some of Raphael Troncy's (CC'd) projects are 
>> the only ones I know of that were using LODE, and I don't know how 
>> much any of those were relying on the lode:circa property. But it 
>> seems to me that revising the definition of the property to have less 
>> specific implications (e.g. changing the range to time:Interval or
>> time:ProperInterval) would not cause too much havoc…
>
> Indeed. In my project, we didn't use the lode:circa property.
>
> The UK Archives Hub endpoint is at 
> http://data.archiveshub.ac.uk/sparql

> I think, but I didn't try whether they were using the lode:circa 
> property or not.
>
>    Raphaël
>
> --
> Raphaël Troncy
> EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
> Data Science Department
> 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/

Received on Monday, 17 April 2017 00:46:13 UTC