Re: SDW-BP ready for review pending Working Draft release

Hi Andrea. Apologies- I didn't merge your PR [1] until just now. It's a
minor editorial change so I don't think it changes the vote.

Thanks for progressing this :)

Jeremy


[1]: https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/400#merged-event
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 at 16:42, Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
wrote:

> Hi, Jeremy.
>
> This is to let you know that today I created a pull request concerning
> the "explanatory note":
>
> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/400
>
> Andrea
>
> On 09/10/2016 18:59, Jeremy Tandy wrote:
> > Andrea - we're very happy to accommodate minor editorial change. We'll
> > use the WG list to discuss & flag the PR with changes. Nothing
> > substantive at this time though- although feel free to spin up a new
> > branch.
> >
> > BR. Jeremy
> > On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 at 09:59, Andrea Perego
> > <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     Jeremy, Linda, Payam, many thanks for this work!
> >
> >     I realise I still have to add an explanatory note on one of the
> >     examples, as per what agreed with Linda in [1].
> >
> >     I'll do that within next Wednesday, if this suits you.
> >
> >     BTW, proposals for minor editorial changes are still possible? I
> mean,
> >     typos, links, formatting, etc. Also, syntax highlighting in Turtle
> >     examples doesn't seem to work properly - in particular, all strings
> >     after "//" (as for HTTP URIs: "http://") are formatted as comments
> (so I
> >     guess it is highlighted as in JSON).
> >
> >     Andrea
> >
> >     ----
> >     [1]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Aug/0003.html
> >
> >
> >     On 06/10/2016 21:52, Jeremy Tandy wrote:
> >     > All. Months have passed since FPWD, but finally we're ready to ask
> >     _you_
> >     > to vote for another Working Draft release of the SDW Best Practice
> >     > document - please can you have a read through the Editors Draft
> [1] -
> >     > especially noting the statements in the "Status of this Document"
> >     (SOTD)
> >     > section [2]
> >     >
> >     > There _may_ still be a few changes isolated to the Glossary [3]
> (@bill
> >     > has promised to make changes before Monday if changes are to be
> >     made!).
> >     >
> >     > The vote to release will be on our next Plenary WG call: 19
> October.
> >     >
> >     > Thanks for all your help (especially my fellow editors) to get us
> this
> >     > far. Yes, there's more to do - but we're keen to share the
> >     improvements
> >     > since FPWD.
> >     >
> >     > Jeremy
> >     >
> >     > [1]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/
> >     > [2]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#sotd
> >     > [3]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#glossary
> >
> >     --
> >     Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> >     Scientific / Technical Project Officer
> >     European Commission DG JRC
> >     Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
> >     Unit B6 - Digital Economy
> >     Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> >     21027 Ispra VA, Italy
> >
> >     https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
> >
> >     ----
> >     The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
> >     not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
> >     position of the European Commission.
> >
>
> --
> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> Scientific / Technical Project Officer
> European Commission DG JRC
> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
> Unit B6 - Digital Economy
> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>
> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
>
> ----
> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
> position of the European Commission.
>