W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > October 2016

Re: SDW-BP ready for review pending Working Draft release

From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:42:20 +0200
To: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <47f61497-c445-3696-fcca-bfc7f3b0e7b1@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Hi, Jeremy.

This is to let you know that today I created a pull request concerning 
the "explanatory note":

https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/400

Andrea

On 09/10/2016 18:59, Jeremy Tandy wrote:
> Andrea - we're very happy to accommodate minor editorial change. We'll
> use the WG list to discuss & flag the PR with changes. Nothing
> substantive at this time though- although feel free to spin up a new
> branch.
>
> BR. Jeremy
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 at 09:59, Andrea Perego
> <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>>
> wrote:
>
>     Jeremy, Linda, Payam, many thanks for this work!
>
>     I realise I still have to add an explanatory note on one of the
>     examples, as per what agreed with Linda in [1].
>
>     I'll do that within next Wednesday, if this suits you.
>
>     BTW, proposals for minor editorial changes are still possible? I mean,
>     typos, links, formatting, etc. Also, syntax highlighting in Turtle
>     examples doesn't seem to work properly - in particular, all strings
>     after "//" (as for HTTP URIs: "http://") are formatted as comments (so I
>     guess it is highlighted as in JSON).
>
>     Andrea
>
>     ----
>     [1]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Aug/0003.html
>
>
>     On 06/10/2016 21:52, Jeremy Tandy wrote:
>     > All. Months have passed since FPWD, but finally we're ready to ask
>     _you_
>     > to vote for another Working Draft release of the SDW Best Practice
>     > document - please can you have a read through the Editors Draft [1] -
>     > especially noting the statements in the "Status of this Document"
>     (SOTD)
>     > section [2]
>     >
>     > There _may_ still be a few changes isolated to the Glossary [3] (@bill
>     > has promised to make changes before Monday if changes are to be
>     made!).
>     >
>     > The vote to release will be on our next Plenary WG call: 19 October.
>     >
>     > Thanks for all your help (especially my fellow editors) to get us this
>     > far. Yes, there's more to do - but we're keen to share the
>     improvements
>     > since FPWD.
>     >
>     > Jeremy
>     >
>     > [1]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/
>     > [2]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#sotd
>     > [3]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#glossary
>
>     --
>     Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
>     Scientific / Technical Project Officer
>     European Commission DG JRC
>     Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
>     Unit B6 - Digital Economy
>     Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
>     21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>
>     https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
>
>     ----
>     The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
>     not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
>     position of the European Commission.
>

-- 
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/

----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.
Received on Monday, 17 October 2016 15:43:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 17 October 2016 15:43:07 UTC