- From: Scott Simmons <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 16:00:15 -0600
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
Phil, Actually linking to the specific OGC standard document (as defined by its version/date) is correct as those URLs do not change, even if the standard is deprecated or updated. I will look into Specref - seems like a darn good idea! Best Regards, Scott > On Oct 5, 2016, at 3:43 PM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > > Jeremy, Scott, everyone, > > As promised earlier, I've been working on the bibliography and all the yellow has gone. But, some notes: > > Links to 5 star data aren't straightforward. 5stardata.info is a helpful site put together by Michael Hausenblas, formerly of the W3C Community, but it's not the actual definition. That's at https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData#fivestar, which is part of the overall definition of Linked Data that TimBL wrote around the time Noah was building his ark. > > I notice some references to the Linked Data Platform Primer (https://www.w3.org/TR/ldp-primer/) - is that a surrogate for a primer on Linked Data? (It's not really a good one. There *are* primers on LD, but that's not it. I'd more likely recommend http://linkeddatabook.com/editions/1.0/ (it has a DOI so it must be real ;-) ) > > @Scott - this is for you > > More importantly... how should we link to OGC specs. The URLs in the doc pointed to landing pages (/standards/wfs etc.) where there's a bunch of links to other docs. It 'feels' more correct to link to the actual specs that have things like publication dates, a status, editor names etc. So I've done that but if it's wrong, please shout. > > Actually, what would be *really* helpful would be if Specref automatically included OGC specs as well as the current W3C, IETF and WHATWG (i.e. if you know the RFC number, you can *always* just include [[RFC2119]] etc. SpecRef is always up to date and searchable through http://www.specref.org). Naturally, it's a question of messing around with code on GitHub https://github.com/tobie/specref > > Anyway... the only remaining yellow are bits in the glossary etc. So, I think my action-199 is done. > > Phil. > > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 >
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 22:00:43 UTC