W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > November 2016

RE: Joint SDW paper

From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:28:49 +0000
To: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>, "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
CC: Payam Barnaghi <payam.barnaghi@gmail.com>, "Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@gmail.com)" <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <13F9BF0BE056DA42BFE5AA6E476CDEFE7260E582@GNMSRV01.gnm.local>
Hi Rob,

Thank you! I haven’t thought about this (how to characterise BP rel sem web) yet, your suggestion could work. I don’t think we have a specific solution yet that we can call a BP.


Van: Rob Atkinson [mailto:rob@metalinkage.com.au]
Verzonden: donderdag 17 november 2016 10:40
Aan: Linda van den Brink; SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)
CC: Payam Barnaghi; Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@gmail.com)
Onderwerp: Re: Joint SDW paper


I'm happy to sign up and try to contribute. I'm wondering how you are planning on characterising the BP in the sem web context - maybe by showing some of the variability in existing implementation, and stating the principles (BP) which should be applied in trying to solve the problem , rather than offering a specific solution and evaluating it?


On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 19:08 Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl<mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>> wrote:
Hi all,

As I announced at the very end of the telecon yesterday, I’m preparing a paper about the SDW BP. Payam and I prepared an abstract and TOC, and want to try getting it published in Semantic Web Journal. Of course the work we’ll be writing about is done by all of you, so I want to list as many of you as possible as co-authors. I even started adding everyone on https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=75471&public=1 but there’s about fifty names there…

So what I want to do is at least list the BP editors; followed by any participant in this group who tells me they want to be listed as author and contribute something. A contribution could be actually writing a bit of text for the paper, or reviewing (a section of) the paper, participate in discussions on the paper, give some input for the paper, or just having been active on the BP work in this group.

In addition we’ll put an acknowledgement in the paper (a first draft of that is already in the abstract). But I really don’t want anyone to feel left out so _please_ don’t hesitate to let me know if you want to be listed as an author! Just a reply with a simple ‘yes’ is enough.

The abstract of the paper is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CAtrBt1P8TMtZDrZYU2Q9-RmtzeWxwl-iEMFfLn2uqg/edit?usp=sharing

Linda and Payam
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 10:29:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:27 UTC