Re: Joint SDW paper

hi

I'm happy to sign up and try to contribute. I'm wondering how you are
planning on characterising the BP in the sem web context - maybe by showing
some of the variability in existing implementation, and stating the
principles (BP) which should be applied in trying to solve the problem ,
rather than offering a specific solution and evaluating it?

Cheers
Rob


On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 19:08 Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> As I announced at the very end of the telecon yesterday, I’m preparing a
> paper about the SDW BP. Payam and I prepared an abstract and TOC, and want
> to try getting it published in Semantic Web Journal. Of course the work
> we’ll be writing about is done by all of you, so I want to list as many of
> you as possible as co-authors. I even started adding everyone on
> https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=75471&public=1 but there’s
> about fifty names there…
>
>
>
> So what I want to do is at least list the BP editors; followed by any
> participant in this group who tells me they want to be listed as author and
> contribute something. A contribution could be actually writing a bit of
> text for the paper, or reviewing (a section of) the paper, participate in
> discussions on the paper, give some input for the paper, or just having
> been active on the BP work in this group.
>
>
>
> In addition we’ll put an acknowledgement in the paper (a first draft of
> that is already in the abstract). But I really don’t want anyone to feel
> left out so _*please*_ don’t hesitate to let me know if you want to be
> listed as an author! Just a reply with a simple ‘yes’ is enough.
>
>
>
> The abstract of the paper is here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CAtrBt1P8TMtZDrZYU2Q9-RmtzeWxwl-iEMFfLn2uqg/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
> Linda and Payam
>