Re: F2F meetings (was Re: SDW Plenary Call this week)

I can also host in London on those dates which may be a more convenient
option - I'm of course also happy to visit Amersfoort once again.

Let's do a quick poll via email as to the preferred destination for those
able to make the dates. Vote London or Amersfoort in the next 24 hours...

Ed

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, 08:30 Linda van den Brink, <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Last week we discussed another set of dates: 15th-16th December.
>
> See minutes: https://www.w3.org/2016/11/02-sdw-minutes
>
>
>
> Not sure where it will be hosted yet. Amersfoort is an option, I’m holding
> the meeting room just in case, but don’t know how long I can keep holding
> it.
>
>
>
> Linda
>
>
>
> *Van:* Bill Roberts [mailto:bill@swirrl.com]
> *Verzonden:* woensdag 2 november 2016 16:28
> *Aan:* Phil Archer
> *CC:* public-sdw-wg@w3.org
> *Onderwerp:* Re: F2F meetings (was Re: SDW Plenary Call this week)
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
>
>
> On the topic of F2F meetings, and because I can't make the call tonight: I
> could make a F2F in London or Amersfoort on 12 or 14 December but not 13.
> On 13th, I could join the afternoon part of a virtual meeting.
>
>
>
> While F2F meetings are generally easier and more productive it wouldn't
> break my heart not to have to travel that week.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> On 2 November 2016 at 14:13, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
>
> And I'm sorry but I need to send regrets for the call today.
>
> On the subject of F2F meeting planning:
>
> It looks like we're not going to get sufficient people together to be in
> London on 13 - 14 December to make it worth while those that can meeting up.
>
> I know Linda has offered to host a meeting again in Amersfoort. Some
> groups have virtual F2F meetings, i.e. extended telcos and maybe that would
> be useful? One of the key things about a F2F, whether real or virtual, is
> that it provides a deadline for progress and I hope we'll be able to get
> updated versions of Time, SSN and maybe the BP doc out before Christmas, as
> well as FPWDs of the Coverages docs. So some sort of sprint followed by a
> December F2F (real or virtual) seems valuable from my perspective.
>
> Rec/standards track docs need to be ready for Candidate Rec by Feb (March
> latest) so time is running out. We have scheduled a final F2F meeting in
> Delft for March to coincide with the TC there so I'm hoping that when we
> leave there, editors will have enough info to complete all docs within a
> week or so after that.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil
>
> On 01/11/2016 09:34, Ed Parsons wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> This week is a plenary call week, at our winter meeting time of 20:00 GMT
> <
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20161102T20&p1=136
> >
> .
>
> The agenda and meeting details are on the wiki as usual...
>
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20161102
>
> but for convenience...
>
>    1. New Publications promotion
>    2. Face to Face meeting planning
>    3. Rob's Dimensions (Rob)
>    4. Review of Outstanding Actions
>
> If you can't make it please do send your regrets, thanks
>
> Ed & Kerry
>
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
>
>
>
-- 

*Ed Parsons *FRGS
Geospatial Technologist, Google

Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501
www.edparsons.com @edparsons