- From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:48:20 +0000
- To: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACfF9LwDghTqUa3a2+D=1ZOVszGKR5Wx0aHLHKDLStTkqU1biA@mail.gmail.com>
+1 can I suggest that before we invest in a particular modularisation we create stubs with imports and documentation about what each module is designed to achieve - and debate that - otherwise I feel we'll have effort invested in something that becomes difficult to deal with later. Cheers Rob On Fri, 27 May 2016 at 16:26 Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au> wrote: > While “modularity” is clearly top priority for our next unit of work in > the group, even **before** we go too far on that, I want to deal with > issue-60. > > Most particularly the past about “fix typos and spelling” of which there > are several. > > The thing is , this should be done before we go very far down the > modularisation path as surely everyone is going to be pulling apart ssn as > it now is in webprotege (WP). > > It will be much easier to do this in one pass over the current form than > leaving it until further changes are done. > > > > Also, although I am willing (and keen) to do this, I want to do it in > text form (ie not using (WP) ) for obvious reasons. Which means it could > interfere with other changes. > > > > So… I propose to, at some time that I can start and finish in a short > transaction, ask everyone to leave WP alone while I do it offline and then > to replace the WP version. > > > > This is advanced warning in case anyone wants to object – if it is ok I > will announce when I am starting and when I finish. > > > > --Kerry > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 27 May 2016 07:49:03 UTC