W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2016

RE: Progress on Time deliverable - was RE: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 12:45:57 +0000
To: "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <13F9BF0BE056DA42BFE5AA6E476CDEFE725D3F75@GNMSRV01.gnm.local>
Thanks for your work on this Simon! I have reading this draft on my task list. In the Netherlands we have used some bits of Time in an ontology for historic place names. 

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Simon.Cox@csiro.au [mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au] 
Verzonden: donderdag 26 mei 2016 00:31
Aan: public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Onderwerp: Progress on Time deliverable - was RE: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

>    jtandy: I believe Simon is taking his previous work and putting it into shape. Chris is providing wider context

Yes. This is now essentially complete, in the draft http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/ . 
There are a number of ISSUEs highlighted in the text, most linked to issues in the tracker https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/open 

I've also put the draft revised ontology in the github repo, and linked it in the document following the same style as in the SSN document, as well as two documents containing the examples I added - see https://github.com/w3c/sdw/tree/gh-pages/time/rdf . 

Chris has much deeper knowledge about temporal reference systems, so I put a hook in there for him to respond to -  http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/#time:TRS but no bite yet. 

The document may be suitable to be issued as FPWD, but, as Ed notes, so far I've been the sole contributor. 
I have consensus with myself, but that's probably not good enough ... 


-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, 26 May 2016 12:31 AM
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Subject: [Minutes] 2016-05-25

The minutes of today's meeting are at
https://www.w3.org/2016/05/25-sdw-minutes with a text snapshot below.


Time Progress

    <eparsons> [13]http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/

      [13] http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/

    eparsons: this is stuff that Simon has been getting on and

    <frans> Does the SDW BP reference DW best practices by URI?

    eparsons: Pretty much on his own.
    ... He has difficulty joining these calls due to time zone
    ... I guess this is a call for us to look at it and then
    socialise it/.
    ... But note that there is a lot of good work going on.

    jtandy: Chris is still involved and working with Simon. I've
    been in Geneva so a bit out of the loop.

    eparsons: I just want to make sure it's not just Simon working
    in isolation.

    jtandy: I believe Simon is taking his previous work and putting
    it into shape. Chris is providing wider context


    [End of minutes]

Received on Thursday, 26 May 2016 12:46:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:21 UTC