- From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 15:51:21 +0000
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADtUq_2TTZAS9BR6L89+yCvPDpVbLTM3YrGZ+jYBpzSrU52Snw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi- great news that DWBP are into their final leg. Having read through the doc a number of times of the last couple of months I think that it is very well put together. Congratulations to the [editorial] team. I have been looking at the DWBP with an aim to use it as a foundation to SDWBP. I conclude that: * _All_ of the best practices apply to Spatial Data. * Some of the best practices we would choose to be more specific on (for example, DWBP #15 'use standard vocabularies' can be extended to say _which_ standard vocabulary/vocabularies should be used for spatial [& temporal] data). * DWBP does not give Linking the level of emphasis that we have talked about in SDW- so SDWBP will [likely] include a few best practices that are "new" and don't extend those in DWBP. Given the strong alignment between DWBP and SDWBP, in some cases I don't even think we need specify a best practice in SDWBP; all that is required is that our examples show how the relevant DWBP best practice may be applied in the context of spatial data. I've not finished concluding yet - but hopefully this gives an idea of direction of travel. Will share this with the SDW WG soon(ish) and gather feedback on approach ... Jeremy On Wed, 25 May 2016 at 09:27, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > As you may have seen, last Thursday the DWBP WG published a new version > on its BP doc and supporting vocabularies. These are now stable with a > couple of specific issues in the vocabs and no known issues for the BP > doc which is expected to transition to Candidate Recommendation next month. > > So we're now in the final call for comments ahead of the call for > implementations which comes next. > > The input provided by the individuals in the To line of this mail are > already acknowledged but if there are further comments, please get them > to the WG by 12 June. I'm thinking in particular of the alignment with > SDW BP to make sure that the latter sensibly builds on DWBP. > > Please see > > Data on the Web Best Practices > https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/ > > Data Quality Vocabulary > https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/ > > Dataset Usage vocabulary > https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-duv-20160519/ > > Thanks > > Phil. > > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 15:51:59 UTC