- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:26:02 +0100
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Dear all, As you may have seen, last Thursday the DWBP WG published a new version on its BP doc and supporting vocabularies. These are now stable with a couple of specific issues in the vocabs and no known issues for the BP doc which is expected to transition to Candidate Recommendation next month. So we're now in the final call for comments ahead of the call for implementations which comes next. The input provided by the individuals in the To line of this mail are already acknowledged but if there are further comments, please get them to the WG by 12 June. I'm thinking in particular of the alignment with SDW BP to make sure that the latter sensibly builds on DWBP. Please see Data on the Web Best Practices https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/ Data Quality Vocabulary https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/ Dataset Usage vocabulary https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-duv-20160519/ Thanks Phil. -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 08:26:13 UTC