- From: Le Phuoc, Danh <danh.lephuoc@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 12:38:56 +0000
- To: "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, "kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au" <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, "phila@w3.org" <phila@w3.org>, "janowicz@ucsb.edu" <janowicz@ucsb.edu>, "armin.haller@anu.edu.au" <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
- CC: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
I tried with Parrot as well, but Parrot didnąt generate some descriptions that current version of SSN ontology has. Anyway, I think itąs better to do it manually in the next version, it might take more effort but more manageable. Danh On 25/05/2016 03:07, "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> wrote: >> Suggestions for "much better tools" warmly welcomed from the Group. > >I've started using Parrot. http://ontorule-project.eu/parrot/parrot >Not sure if it is 'better', but I think the HTML is slightly less crufty. >Mind you, I did the Time doco manually, as it helped me cross-check the >embedded annotations. > >Simon > >-----Original Message----- >From: Kerry Taylor [mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au] >Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2016 11:35 AM >To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>; janowicz@ucsb.edu; Le Phuoc, Danh ><danh.lephuoc@deri.org>; Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au> >Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> >Subject: RE: LODES of cleaning up > >Pulled and merged, thankyou Phil. >Some of the good stuff of LODE styling has disappeared, but as we need a >much better tool for next time, this is not a concern to me. > >Suggestions for "much better tools" warmly welcomed from the Group. > > " Two things I haven't done are" - I take that to mean they *will* be >done by some poor W3C staffer after the FPWD is approved by SDW? > >Being only a "poor colonial" of British convict extract, and >notwithstanding 3 years of on-the-job schooling at that most esteemed >British institution of pedantry, the Oxford University Press, I am not >trained to even parse expressions like "etymologically accurate >orthography" . On the other hand, I think you would find my writing might > commit that W3C sin, as I do not write "American English" unless I am >tortured to do so. So you might indeed have some work to do. > >-Kerry > >-----Original Message----- >From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] >Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2016 12:06 AM >To: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>; janowicz@ucsb.edu; Le Phuoc, >Danh <danh.lephuoc@deri.org>; Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au> >Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> >Subject: LODES of cleaning up > >SSN Editors, > >I've been through the markup generated by LODE. Nothing wrong with it as >such but there's an awful lot of code that doesn't do a great deal once >you get to a doc like this. So a typical definition section now looks >like this: > ><section id="h-MaintenanceSchedule" class="entity"> > <h4 id="MaintenanceSchedule">Maintenance Schedule</h4> > <p class="iri"> http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/MaintenanceSchedule</p> > <p class="comment">Schedule of...</p> > <dl class="description"> > <dt>has super-classes</dt> > <dd><a href="#OperatingProperty" >title="http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/OperatingProperty">OperatingProperty</a></ >dd> > </dl> ></section> > >I've got rid of all the generated IDs (d3015 or whatever) and replaced >them with the actual terms as IDs on the <h4 /> elements - which means >that the frag IDs within the doc are now the actual terms. A bit of CSS >takes care of the IRIs, decoration of the super/sub classes etc. > >One thing I got rid of that you might like is LODE's addition of >superscripts for 'c' and 'op' for Class, Object property etc. Hope that's >not a problem. > >I've run the doc through the validators etc. so it should be all OK now. >Two things I haven't done are: > >1. Check that the doc uses simplified English throughout (some people >call it American English). The poor colonials really can't cope with >etymologically accurate orthography, bless 'em. > >2. Check for a bit of W3C-weirdness. For our own historical reasons, we >always capitalise Web (I know, I know but it's house rules and all that). > >Obviously I have not applied any relevant OGC rules. > >You can see the result of my labour at >http://philarcher1.github.io/sdw/ssn/ and, if you so wish, accept my Pull >Request https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/262 > >HTH > >Phil. > > >-- > > >Phil Archer >W3C Data Activity Lead >http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > >http://philarcher.org >+44 (0)7887 767755 >@philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 12:39:27 UTC