Re: SDW meeting this week: approve FPWD for SSN

Thanks, Kerry.

Just a couple of preliminary comments:

1. Would it be possible to include a diagram of the defined classes and 
properties? Without it, it is not so easy to understand how they relate, 
and the overall data model.

2. The spec is missing a list of the used namespaces, which is useful to 
know which vocabularies are re-used. Also, in addition to the namespace 
URI, the spec should also state which is the preferred namespace prefix. 
Finally, it would be good to include in the OWL specification a 
description of the ontology using VOAF:



On 23/05/2016 8:48, Kerry Taylor wrote:
> Hi all,
> As planned, the editors of SSN would like to transition  the current SSN
> editors’ draft ( dated 23 May) to the
> status of “First public working draft” in the w3c and “discussion paper”
> in OGC.
> Please do have a good look before the telecon this week, and do please
> remember that there is nothing final about this – it is much more a
> statement of intent and options  littered with “issues” than a
> specification.
> --Kerry

Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

Received on Monday, 23 May 2016 09:26:31 UTC