Re: sub-group time slots in DST (BP and Coverage)

+1 works for me, looking forward to the double header !

Ed

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, 08:02 Linda van den Brink, <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
wrote:

> +1 no problem
>
>
>
> *Van:* Jeremy Tandy [mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com]
> *Verzonden:* woensdag 23 maart 2016 22:18
> *Aan:* SDW WG Public List; Linda van den Brink
> *Onderwerp:* sub-group time slots in DST (BP and Coverage)
>
>
>
> All - at the Best Practices call earlier today, we agreed to move the call
> to 13:00 UTC once daylight-savings catches up with us all.
>
>
>
> (that's 9:00 in Washington DC, 14:00 in the London, and 15:00 in Amsterdam)
>
>
>
> However (!) it seems that the coverage team have more need of that slot to
> cater for their Australian participants; 13:00 UTC is 23:00 in Canberra so
> there's no capacity to go any later than that!
>
>
>
> PROPOSED:
>
>    - *Coverages sub-group meet at 13:00 UTC* (9:00 in Washington DC,
>    14:00 in the London, 15:00 in Amsterdam and 23:00 in Canberra)
>    - *Best Practices sub-group meet at 14:00 UTC* (10:00 in Washington
>    DC, 15:00 in the London, 16:00 in Amsterdam and 00:00+1day in Canberra ...
>    but we don't have any participants from Australia)
>
> What do the Best Practice sub-team think ... especially Linda who raised
> the issue today.
>
>
>
> I'm looking for +1 (or -1) endorsements for the proposal ...
>
>
>
> BR, Jeremy
>
-- 

*Ed Parsons *FRGS
Geospatial Technologist, Google

Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501
www.edparsons.com @edparsons