Re: The spatial ontology on WebProtégé

Probably both. I haven’t really figured out how to do re-factoring on Web Protege, so I’ve just replaced the existing owl file with a new one.

Josh

> On Jun 22, 2016, at 11:26 AM, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hello Josh,
> 
> I have added a reference to the draft ontology you shared on WebProtégé <http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=fa09f9df-1078-4c17-a16c-ae83695ff431> on the wiki page about further development of GeoSPARQL <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Further_development_of_GeoSPARQL>.
> 
> I would like to comment on the ontology, but before I do perhaps it is good to decide how to comment. Comments could be posted to our e-mail list, but could also be added to the WebProtégé project. Do you favour either method? Or both methods?
> 
> Regards,
> Frans
> 
>