- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:37:50 +0200
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFVDz41=Na-_Ss++KC2jTsgVC_ZqVucGQG8kmKfiWmr=e6itjw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, While updating the Use Cases and Requirements document I noticed the section 'Deferred requirements'. The introduction of that sections says *"This section lists requirements that are considered relevant for the group's work, but will not be addressed in the current time frame.". *Currently the section only contains one SSN requirement. I keep wondering about the logic of having this section. If the deferred requirements will not be addressed in the current time frame (I assume that is the period of SDWWG activity), that would mean all the other *will* be addressed. Do we really want to say that? I would be fine with the UCR document listing all requirements and the other deliverables deciding for themselves which requirements will be met and why. I think the decision of deferring meeting a requirement is not one that should be made in the UCR document, it should be made in the deliverables for which the requirements are meant. I will leave the section as it is now, but I would like to ask if there are strong objections against removing the section and putting the SSN requirement it contains back among the other requirements. Regards, Frans
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 09:38:19 UTC