Re: Open UCR issues for the coverage subgroup ISSUE-18, ISSUE-19, ISSUE-32

Ah yes, see what you mean Kerry - I only had the quickest of looks at these
before I replied and see now that it's the ones we talked about as having
relevance for other strands of work as well as coverage.

So yes, I'm happy to address it in the plenary call this week (I'll be
there).

Regards

Bill



On 6 June 2016 at 12:43, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au> wrote:

> These 2 topics  (ISSUE-18 and ISSUE-19) came up at the Coverage meeting
> last week. Also, I note that ISSUE-18 refers to a requirement 5.23 Model
> reuse which is also a requirement on the SSN deliverable 9but has not been
> discussed in SSN meetings).
>
>
>
> So… I propose that, instead of using the he “coverage” meeting next week
> we address them at the plenary SDW meeting this week.
>
>
>
> At the same time, I propose we cover ISSUE-32 (see today’s email from
> Frans titled “Merge requirements for non-geographic reference systems?”
> which  refers to both the BP and SSN deliverables, with a relationship to
> Coverage, too.
>
>
>
> Bill, Frans, SSN editors – are you ok with attempting to finalise these
> this week in the plenary?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> –Kerry
>
>
>
> *From:* Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl]
> *Sent:* Monday, 6 June 2016 8:20 PM
> *To:* Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
> *Cc:* SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Open UCR issues for the coverage subgroup
>
>
>
> Hello Bill,
>
>
>
> We still have two open UCR issues that are waiting to be resolved by
> cooperation between the UCR and coverage subgroups. The issues are
> ISSUE-18 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/18> and ISSUE-19
> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/19>. Related actions (
> ACTION-114 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/114> and
> ACTION-115 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/115>) were
> assigned to Manolis before the coverage subgroup really started.
>
>
>
> Would it be possible for the coverage subgroup to address these two issues
> in the near future? It would be nice to be able to close them. Perhaps a
> time slot in the next coverage meeting can be found?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Frans
>
>
>
>
>