The proposal we arrived to now looks good to me. The only change, where I second Simon is, that we should rename Actuation to Actuating. That is then aligned to Sensing and also implies an Activity. The same applies to Observation which I would rename Observing. Although, I am not sure if we need the Observing class in the core if we have Sensing anyway. From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu> Reply-To: "janowicz@ucsb.edu" <janowicz@ucsb.edu> Date: Wednesday, 27 July 2016 6:34 am To: "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com" <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com> Cc: "danh.lephuoc@tu-berlin.de" <danh.lephuoc@tu-berlin.de>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: Updated SOSA core RE: SOSA core - procedures vs devices I made some cosmetic changes and pushed them to github. I am going to make another series of changes that are a bit bigger and thus will leave them in https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/kjanowicz-ssn/ssn/rdf/sosa.ttl for now until we agree on them. Most of this is from our last discussion about procedures and platforms. Jano On 07/18/2016 10:01 PM, Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au> wrote: I’ve just pushed an update to the SOSA Core ontology https://github.com/w3c/sdw/tree/simon-ssn/ssn/rdf in particular https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/simon-ssn/ssn/rdf/sosa.ttl This includes the hierarchy shown on the wiki page https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SOSA_Ontology I’ve cleaned up the class names a bit, and added documentation on all elements. Simon -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu<mailto:jano@geog.ucsb.edu> Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2016 21:58:19 UTC