Re: Coverage subgroup call 27 July 2016, 13:00 UTC

Great - thanks Rob.  It would definitely be useful to discuss what approach
we might take to recommending how to use QB for coverages.


On 26 July 2016 at 12:50, Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au> wrote:

> Hi Bill
>
> I have a straw man for a set of ready-to-use QB dimensions for basic
> spatio-temporal cases - I've just sent it off to Josh to sanity check the
> connection with his work on a lightweight spatial ontology - I'll have it
> ready to throw to the wolves by the call.
>
> Rob
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 at 18:14 Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> The dial-in details and agenda for tomorrow's coverage subgroup call are
>> now on the wiki at
>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Coverage-Telecon20160727
>>
>> The main item on the agenda is to review the proposed outputs and
>> approach for the group as described in my mailing list post from last week:
>>
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Jul/0172.html
>>
>> See also subsequent discussion on that mailing list thread.
>>
>> This discussion will be quite important for determining the subsequent
>> direction for the group, so do please join if you can.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>