Content negotiation of spatial linked data from Joshua Lieberman on 2016-07-20 (public-sdw-wg@w3.org from July 2016)

From: Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:54:21 -0400
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <DD9F1E79-8191-4516-9F49-9CAB8C8E253D@tumblingwalls.com>

I’ve added a comment to the wiki about geometry serialization negotiation:

https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Further_development_of_GeoSPARQL#Negotiate_geometry_serializations <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Further_development_of_GeoSPARQL#Negotiate_geometry_serializations> 

It seems the best idea may be to define a content type parameter for the available / desired serialization, but that would presumably need to be added to a linked spatial data API best practice.

—Josh

Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 15:55:29 UTC