I’ve added a comment to the wiki about geometry serialization negotiation: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Further_development_of_GeoSPARQL#Negotiate_geometry_serializations <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Further_development_of_GeoSPARQL#Negotiate_geometry_serializations> It seems the best idea may be to define a content type parameter for the available / desired serialization, but that would presumably need to be added to a linked spatial data API best practice. —JoshReceived on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 15:55:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:23 UTC