- From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:37:32 -0700
- To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au, armin.haller@anu.edu.au, public-sdw-wg@w3.org
- Cc: kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au, danh.lephuoc@deri.org
- Message-ID: <578546FC.7060103@ucsb.edu>
Hi all, I made some changes to SOSA-core at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/kjanowicz-ssn/ssn/rdf/sosa.ttl . > SOSA (Sensing-Observations-Sampling-Actuation ontology) In the code it said 'Sensing, Observation, Sampling and Actuating (SOSA) Core Ontology' so I changed Observation to Observing. > rdfs:comment "An Observation is a Situation in which a Sensing method > [...] I am very happy with this current formulation (whoever made it); do we all agree? I made some small changes to the rest of the comment. > the Result is the output of a Sensor." ; Based on the other comments (e.g., for Procedure), this sentence is too restrictive. Would you agree? > sosa-core:Procedure I think this is something that we seem to disagree on, maybe worth discussing today? Please also note the difference to sosa-core:SamplingProcedure which (IMHO) captures the meaning of a Procedure. > sosa-core:Sensor See above.I think we should tell apart the instrument/method from the way it is used. > [...]which contains a value representing the value associated with the > observed Property. [...] The second 'value' is also worth discussing. > rdfs:subPropertyOf owl:topObjectProperty ; I would suggest to remove this for SOSA-Core to keep it as close as possible to mere RDF (and because it does not mean anything on this level anyway). Other than that, I made some minor changes and added missing comments. E.g., > rdfs:comment "Relation between a Sensor and Observations it has made." ; --> rdfs:comment "Relation between a Sensor and an Observation it has made." ; Best, Jano On 07/04/2016 09:31 AM, Krzysztof Janowicz wrote: > Fantastic! I am just looking at it. I am unsure whether rangeIncludes > and domainIncludes should go in there as they have no formal > semantics. This means that they are not part of the meta-language. > This may turn out to be a problem. I have to think about this... > > Thanks Simon! > > > On 07/04/2016 03:28 AM, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote: >> >> Folks – I’ve done some work today to turn Jano’s proposal for >> modularization [1][2] into a more fully worked strawman. >> >> I’ve provisionally called it SOSA >> (Sensing-Observations-Sampling-Actuation ontology) and loaded RDF >> files into GitHub. >> >> See documentation here: >> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SOSA_Ontology >> >> Enjoy. >> >> Simon >> >> [1] >> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Proposals_for_rewriting_SSN#Proposal_5_made_by_KJanowicz >> >> [2] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SSN_core_modules >> >> *From:*Simon.Cox@csiro.au [mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au] >> *Sent:* Thursday, 30 June 2016 10:51 AM >> *To:* armin.haller@anu.edu.au; public-sdw-wg@w3.org >> *Cc:* kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au; janowicz@ucsb.edu; danh.lephuoc@deri.org >> *Subject:* [ExternalEmail] Detailed comments on SANDA >> >> I’ve added a few comments on SANDA in WebProtege [1] – initially I >> posted than as rdfs:comment properties on the class and property >> definitions, but I’ve now spotted the discussion-topic capability, so >> have moved my questions there. They related to >> >> 1.The names of the classes currently called Process, >> ObservedProperty, FeatureOfInterest >> >> 2.The range of the property feature-of-interest >> >> 3.The definition of resultTime >> >> 4.The need for an additional time property. >> >> Several of these suggestions relate to alignment with om-lite. >> >> Simon >> >> [1] >> http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=32a4ea9e-4d06-4f92-8188-07fcd96f81a7 >> >> >> *From:*Armin Haller [mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, 29 June 2016 9:54 AM >> *To:* Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>; >> public-sdw-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org> >> *Cc:* Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au >> <mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>>; janowicz@ucsb.edu >> <mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>; danh.lephuoc@deri.org >> <mailto:danh.lephuoc@deri.org> >> *Subject:* Re: Proposal for SSN core >> >> Maybe directly adding comments in Webprotege and then a mail to the list? >> >> *From: *"Simon.Cox@csiro.au <mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>" >> <Simon.Cox@csiro.au <mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>> >> *Date: *Wednesday, 29 June 2016 6:53 am >> *To: *Armin Haller >> <<mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au>armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, >> "public-sdw-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>" >> <public-sdw-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>> >> *Cc: *Kerry Taylor >> <<mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, >> "janowicz@ucsb.edu <mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>" <janowicz@ucsb.edu >> <mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>>, "danh.lephuoc@deri.org >> <mailto:danh.lephuoc@deri.org>" <danh.lephuoc@deri.org >> <mailto:danh.lephuoc@deri.org>> >> *Subject: *RE: Proposal for SSN core >> >> What is the best way to make comments? >> >> Simon >> >> *From:*Armin Haller >> [<mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au>mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au] >> *Sent:* Monday, 27 June 2016 5:52 PM >> *To:* SDW WG Public List >> <<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>public-sdw-wg@w3.org> >> *Cc:* Kerry Taylor >> <<mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>; Krzysztof >> Janowicz <<mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>janowicz@ucsb.edu>; >> <mailto:danh.lephuoc@deri.org>danh.lephuoc@deri.org >> *Subject:* Proposal for SSN core >> >> Hi, >> >> I have made and uploaded a proposal for the SSN core ontology at: >> >> http://webprotege.stanford.edu/#Edit:projectId=32a4ea9e-4d06-4f92-8188-07fcd96f81a7 >> >> It is largely similar to what Krzysztof proposed on the Wiki: >> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SSN_core_modules>https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SSN_core_modules >> >> I added Actuators and called the core subsequently “Sensor and >> Actuator Core Ontology” aka “Sanda”. I also added domain and range as >> annotation properties, please check if you agree, but as discussed >> there should not be any domain and range restrictions in the core. >> >> Cheers, >> Armin >> > > > -- > Krzysztof Janowicz > > Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara > 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 > > Email:jano@geog.ucsb.edu > Webpage:http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ > Semantic Web Journal:http://www.semantic-web-journal.net -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email:jano@geog.ucsb.edu Webpage:http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal:http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 19:38:10 UTC