Re: [SDW] Approving OWL-time for FPWD

Hi Simon,

Thanks for your quick fix and reply.

> Please make a concrete suggestion.
>

Yes, something like this for Idaho sample, where we don't use anymore 
that old daml namespace

:IDIdaho
       a       :County ;
       :name "Idaho County" ;
       :hasParentRegion <http://sws.geonames.org/6252001/> ;
       :timeZonePart :IDIdahoPST , :IDIdahoMST ;
       owl:sameAs <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Idaho_County,_Idaho> ;
       .

> Also note, however, that the Time Zone part of the document is at risk 
> – it has not been revised yet.
>
OK, good to know.

Best,
Ghislain

-- 
--------------------------------------------
Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
R&D Engineer
@ Mondeca, Paris, France
Labs: http://labs.mondeca.com
Tel: +33 (0)1 4111 3034
Web: www.mondeca.com
Twitter: @gatemezing
About Me: http://atemezing.org