RE: [SDW] Approving OWL-time for FPWD

I’ve fixed the first two issues.


Ø  Q1- Could it be possible to use for the owl:sameAs links some external resources already avaible on the Web such as Dbpedia, Geonames or LGDataset for the city names (Idaho County, etc) ?

Please make a concrete suggestion.
Also note, however, that the Time Zone part of the document is at risk – it has not been revised yet.


Ø  Q2- How could a vocabulary like the intervals at http://reference.data.gov.uk/def/intervals can be mapped with some terms of the new vocabulary?

That’s an interesting looking resource. However, I can’t find any documentation, and trimming the URI doesn’t help. I also note that some of the RDF vocabularies used are now superseded (prv-->prov-o)
Also looks like the intervals: vocabulary largely duplicates OWL-Time. How would you suggest that we acknowledge it?

Simon



From: Ghislain Atemezing-Pro [mailto:ghislain.atemezing@mondeca.com]
Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2016 12:57 AM
To: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>; Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
Cc: public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Subject: Re: [SDW] Approving OWL-time for FPWD

Hi Simon, Chris, all
I was having a look at the draft of July 7th, 2016. I hope it's not too late :(

+ I suggest to add a reference to [OWL2-DL] reference
+ There is a small typo in the :NVWestWendoverCity sample; s/samelAs/sameAs .

I have also 2 small questions:
Q1- Could it be possible to use for the owl:sameAs links some external resources already avaible
on the Web such as Dbpedia, Geonames or LGDataset for the city names (Idaho County, etc) ?

Q2- How could a vocabulary like the intervals at http://reference.data.gov.uk/def/intervals can be mapped with some terms of the new vocabulary?


Cheers,

Ghislain

Le mar. 5 juil. 2016 à 12:46, Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>> a écrit :
Thanks, Kerry.

I've started reviewing it, and I made some editorial changes via GH.

@Simon, I'm now going to submit the relevant pull request, including the
detailed list of proposed revisions.

Cheers,

Andrea



On 05/07/2016 9:02, Kerry Taylor wrote:
> As you will recall, we had hoped to approve the W3C First Public Working
> Draft and OGC Discussion document at the previous plenary meeting of the
> Working group.   The Ed Draft http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/  has now
> been stable for more than a week and there are no outstanding issues of
> which I am aware that should delay the approval any longer.
>
>
>
> So… we will be proposing to approve it in the plenary  meeting tomorrow
> 6 July 2016 13:00 GMT. We have some concerns about a potential low
> turnout at the meeting, as it Is  apparently summer holiday period for
> many of our participants.  So, please COME to the MEETING!
>
>
>
> If you cannot come to the meeting, please indicate your support for
>  publishing the Editors’ draft http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/  dated 28
> June 2016,   by  reply-all email to the list with a +1.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kerry & Ed
>
>
>

--
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/

--
--------------------------------------------
Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
R&D Engineer
@ Mondeca, Paris, France
Labs: http://labs.mondeca.com

Tel: +33 (0)1 4111 3034
Web: www.mondeca.com<http://www.mondeca.com>
Twitter: @gatemezing
About Me: http://atemezing.org