W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > February 2016

Re: Glossary/Definitions - RE: [Minutes] 2016-02-09 F2F Day 2

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:50:49 +0000
To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au, public-sdw-wg@w3.org, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
Message-ID: <56BB9499.7020606@w3.org>
+ Linda

Simon,

Geonovum's Paul Janssen approached me this evening to talk about this 
very topic. I ended up saying that *if* this WG so desired, we could go 
through some cycles of liaison with TC211 to make sure everyone was 
happy and, if so, publish their glossary as a SKOS concept scheme in 
w3.org space (full credit, their doc is normative, all mistakes are ours 
yada yada). (All good concept schemes come with human readable HTML 
versions of course).

WDYT?

Phil.

On 09/02/2016 23:25, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:
>>        [42] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Glossary_of_terms
>
> The ISO/TC 211 Glossary is also publicly available.
> http://www.isotc211.org/Terminology.htm
> Why not just use that?
> It is currently a spreadsheet, but it has been suggested to convert into linked data resources.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2016 1:57 AM
> To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: [Minutes] 2016-02-09 F2F Day 2
>
> Minutes from today's F2F meeting are, of course, at
> https://www.w3.org/2016/02/09-sdw-minutes.
>
> The text version is pasted below.
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 19:51:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:20 UTC