- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:50:49 +0000
- To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au, public-sdw-wg@w3.org, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
+ Linda Simon, Geonovum's Paul Janssen approached me this evening to talk about this very topic. I ended up saying that *if* this WG so desired, we could go through some cycles of liaison with TC211 to make sure everyone was happy and, if so, publish their glossary as a SKOS concept scheme in w3.org space (full credit, their doc is normative, all mistakes are ours yada yada). (All good concept schemes come with human readable HTML versions of course). WDYT? Phil. On 09/02/2016 23:25, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote: >> [42] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Glossary_of_terms > > The ISO/TC 211 Glossary is also publicly available. > http://www.isotc211.org/Terminology.htm > Why not just use that? > It is currently a spreadsheet, but it has been suggested to convert into linked data resources. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2016 1:57 AM > To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> > Subject: [Minutes] 2016-02-09 F2F Day 2 > > Minutes from today's F2F meeting are, of course, at > https://www.w3.org/2016/02/09-sdw-minutes. > > The text version is pasted below. > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 19:51:38 UTC