RE: SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?

Ø  We do need the SSN-SSNX alignment section to be normative for the implementation evidence.

A normative O&M alignment would provide a huge supply of implementation evidence!

From: Armin Haller [mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 December, 2016 15:18
To: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>; public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?

I will put this as a first item on the agenda after the vote.

We do need the SSN-SSNX alignment section to be normative for the implementation evidence. There was no decision made on the DUL alignment yet afaik. Kerry was also agnostic about it to be normative/non-normative. Again, I will put this on the agenda for our next meeting.

From: "Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>>
Date: Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 2:55 pm
To: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au<mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au>>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?

OK – not really happy about that, as it reduces the possibility of scrutiny of important technical material. But maybe we can have quicker revision cycles moving forward.

I also just noticed that all the alignment sections _except_ with O&M are marked ‘normative’. That was not my understanding at this stage.

Simon

From: Armin Haller [mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 December, 2016 14:24
To: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>>; public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?

Hi Simon,

Kerry had an objection against these notes (that have been committed after Monday last week) to be included without consultation, therefore they have been removed for this WD. We will discuss them in our next meeting.

Cheers,
Armin

From: "Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>>
Date: Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 11:05 am
To: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>>
Subject: SSN - Notes dropped from O&M alignment chapter?
Resent-From: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 11:10 am

Somewhere in the changes in the last day, we also lost two NOTEs from the O&M alignment section, which pointed to RDF files containing proposed alignments in the GitHub repo. Can these be restored?

Here is the dropped html:

<p class="note">An RDF representation of a preliminary SOSA-O&amp;M alignment is at <a href="https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/ssn/rdf/sosa-om.ttl">https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/ssn/rdf/sosa-om.ttl</a<https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/ssn/rdf/sosa-om.ttl%3c/a>> . URIs from the official ISO/TC 211 OWL implementation are used to identify the UML elements from ISO 19156/OGC O&amp;M. </p>

<p class="note">An RDF representation of a preliminary SOSA-om-lite alignment is at <a href="https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/ssn/rdf/sosa-oml.ttl">https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/ssn/rdf/sosa-oml.ttl</a<https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/ssn/rdf/sosa-oml.ttl%3c/a>>. </p>

Since the files are available, it would be helpful for people reviewing the document to be given a link to find them.

Simon

From: Danh Le Phuoc [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 December, 2016 08:46
To: w3c/sdw <sdw@noreply.github.com<mailto:sdw@noreply.github.com>>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com<mailto:subscribed@noreply.github.com>>
Subject: [w3c/sdw] ISSUE-114: Move SOSA description before SSN (#476)


as proposed in the telco, I swapped section 4 and 5, this PR will address Issue-114, https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/114


________________________________
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/476


Commit Summary

  *   ISSUE-114: Move SOSA description before SSN

File Changes

  *   M ssn/index.html<https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/476/files#diff-0> (6459)

Patch Links:

  *   https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/476.patch

  *   https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/476.diff


—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/476>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAlIL-21Pl6uCPbXegrGY14oxNn_T4Cxks5rKEyvgaJpZM4LSVad>.