Re: No BP telecon this week(?)

I agree we need to be careful not to go into too much detail.  I personally
am coming to the view that we shoudl use _an example_ regarding CRS - and
point to other materials for the full explanation.. and this example should
go in the introduction to set out why a BP is needed for spatial, without
trying to be comprehensive in description or solve the problem.  The
section I have suggested in
https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/194 tries to introduce the BP
aspect, again with CRS as an example.  I think if we need to further
explain CRS to make the document more self-contained it should perhaps be
pushed to an informative appendix.

Rob


On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 17:05 Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Jeremy is on holiday and I’m not available tomorrow afternoon. So there
> will be no BP telecon, unless some of you want to go ahead and have one and
> there’s a volunteer who is willing to chair.
>
>
>
> Some more discussion on the topic of CRS seems a good idea. What really
> needs to be in the BP and what can we reference from elsewhere? From the
> amount of possible things to get across and explain, it seems we could
> write a whole separate document on this topic (which we could if we want
> to, but I’d like to concentrate our efforts on the BP of course)!
>
>
>
> Linda
>
>
>
> *______________________________________*
>
> *Geonovum*
>
> *Linda van den Brink*
>
> *Adviseur Geo-standaarden*
>
>
>
> *a*: Barchman Wuytierslaan 10, 3818 LH Amersfoort
>
> *p*: Postbus 508, 3800 AM Amersfoort
>
> *t*:  + 31 (0)33 46041 00
>
> *m*: + 31 (0)6 1355 57 92
>
> *e:  *l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl <r.beltman@geonovum.nl>
>
> *i*:  www.geonovum.nl
>
> *tw*: @brinkwoman
>
>
>