W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > August 2016

RE: Some more stuff about coordinate reference systems [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

From: Byron Cochrane <bcochrane@linz.govt.nz>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:15:17 +1200
To: 'Bruce Bannerman' <B.Bannerman@bom.gov.au>, 'Jon Blower' <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>, "'public-sdw-wg@w3.org'" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <666FB8D75E95AE42965A0E76A5E5337E15D545244F@prdlsmmsg01.ad.linz.govt.nz>
A bit of informative humour
http://www.xkcd.com/977/

Cheers,
Byron

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Bannerman [mailto:B.Bannerman@bom.gov.au]
Sent: Monday, 8 August 2016 10:50 a.m.
To: Jon Blower; public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Some more stuff about coordinate reference systems [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Thank you Jon.

Martin has done a great job with his presentation at [2].

I know that our web developers would like things spatial to be Œeasyı, but that has consequences.

Bruce


On 5/08/2016, 19:59, "Jon Blower" <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>Iıve been talking offline with Martin Desruisseaux of Geomatys, a CRS
>guru. He has given me lots of information that I thought this group
>might be interested in, to help better understand issues around CRSs.
>This is a complicated area so I apologise if I make any mistakes in
>transmitting Martinıs wisdom!
>
>Firstly, a couple of useful references. Martin is in the Apache SIS
>project, which provides a Java library for spatial data, including very
>comprehensive treatment of CRSs and conversions between CRSs. The SIS
>developer guide [1] is still in development but already has a lot of
>useful information about CRSs, which is useful even if you donıt use
>the library. He also has written a presentation [2], which is a great
>explanation of why we donıt always use WGS84 lat-lon, the importance of
>different datums and some of the issues in transforming between CRSs.
>
>Secondly, a useful point that is not always understood by newcomers. We
>usually talk about latitude and longitude, but often forget about the
>third dimension (ellipsoidal height). When converting between CRSs that
>use different datums, we need the third dimension as well. EPSG
>guidelines say that, if the height is missing, reasonable assumptions are:
>
>1. Height = 0 (i.e. we are standing on the surface of the ellipsoid) 2.
>The height is given by a digital elevation model (i.e. we are standing
>on the surface of the planet)
>
>These two assumptions will, of course, lead to different answers for
>*all
>three* coordinates in the ³new² system (and both assumptions might be
>wrong). This could be important on the Web, because we frequently give
>latitude and longitude, but no information about ellipsoidal height.
>This means that if we convert these coordinates into a new system, we
>will get an uncertain position (and even the horizontal positions in
>the new system are uncertain, not just the height). [Does the Best
>Practice document mention this?]
>
>Finally, the process of converting coordinates between CRSs that use
>different datums can be very involved. Few open-source libraries do it
>³properly² (this is one of the gaps that SIS hopes to fill). I have a
>lot more information from Martin on this point but I think this email
>is long enough already!
>
>Hope this is helpful!
>Jon
>
>
>[1] http://sis.staging.apache.org/book/en/developer-guide.html
>[2] http://home.apache.org/~desruisseaux/SIS/2016-05.odp
>



This message contains information, which may be in confidence and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately (Phone 0800 665 463 or info@linz.govt.nz) and destroy the original message. LINZ accepts no responsibility for changes to this email, or for any attachments, after its transmission from LINZ. Thank You.
Received on Monday, 8 August 2016 21:16:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:24 UTC