W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > April 2016

Re: SSN -- publishing dolce alignment separately

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:23:05 +0100
To: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, Scott Simmons <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>
Cc: Spatial Data on the Web Working Group <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <57172E59.8040405@w3.org>
It depends (of course).

Let me check I've understood you correctly. SSN should be a standard, 
complete with implementation experience. DUL is an optional extension 
that you don't want to put through the full standardisation process but 
you need it to be published in a stable, persistent, citable form.

That would be a Rec and a Note in W3C parlance.

The W3C documents will almost certainly have short URIs of
https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/
https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dul/

And the namespace files are already in place of course at
http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/
http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/dul/

HTH

Phil.

On 20/04/2016 01:19, Kerry Taylor wrote:
> The SSN subgroup decided this morning that there are things (most particularly at this point, the DUL alignment) that we would like to publish *with* ssn but clearly not part of the "recommendation/standard".  Can you please advise us of the appropriate mechanism for this?
>
> In particular with DUL, which was "built-in" to the orginal ssn we have disentangled it to make it "optional" and we prefer that part of (the previous) ssn does not carry the weight or obligations of a standard.
>
> --Kerry
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2016 07:23:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:20 UTC