RE: Best Practice sub-team call: 14:00 UTC, 20-April-2016

+1 for considering this openly.
It is probably the issue that the wider community would most expect to see dealt with in the WG. However, it is definitely a tough issue, and I’m sceptical that it is possible or even desirable to imagine that a single solution is necessary.

From: Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl]
Sent: Monday, 18 April 2016 11:42 PM
To: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Best Practice sub-team call: 14:00 UTC, 20-April-2016

Hello Jeremy,

Could this meeting be an opportunity to discuss the 'agreed spatial ontology' mentioned in the charter (also see this e-mail thread<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Mar/0057.html>)? I feel it could be the most crucial contribution to the data web our group could make, so it would be good to have more clarity on whether and how we wish to pursue this.

Regards,
Frans

2016-04-18 12:09 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com<mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>>:
All. For those participating in the Best Practices sub-team, the next meeting is scheduled for 14:00 UTC this Wednesday (20-April).

Preliminary agenda is here: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:BP-Telecon20160420


Please advise if you want to add anything. If you can't make the meeting, please record your 'regrets', else we'll see you there.

Regards - Jeremy, Linda and Payam.