W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > April 2016

RE: [SDW] [SSN] Agenda for SSN telecon this week

From: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:09:17 +0000
To: "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <PS1PR06MB1740F22257A1D21EA4CE2D82A49E0@PS1PR06MB1740.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Thank you for your comment.

?  Does O&MLite/Prov-O alignment open up the possibility of adding the 'ActivityOfSensing' class to SSN? (And maybe re-considering the names of some classes.)

Yes. This is broadly covered by both points  1.3 and 2 in the draft.

?  No mention of sampling/sampling features.

This is covered by  5. "Extend to cover UCRs and/or wish list items and/or these things https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Working_Use_Cases#Various_Sensor_Use_Cases_.28SSN.29 "

Unless there is no corresponding use case, although I recall that there is. If I am wrong, and this is not covered by an existing  use case, then please propose one into the UCR.

In general, this "future work" section clearly needs some expansion and better writing  in the document prior to release. It is only notes copied from the wiki and discussed in several meetings already so far.  I hope we can assign this writing and other tasks in the SSN meeting tomorrow. I do not anticipate we will be actually doing such development prior to FPWD, as agreed in meetings.


From: Simon.Cox@csiro.au [mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 April 2016 1:17 PM
To: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>; public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: [SDW] [SSN] Agenda for SSN telecon this week

Kerry, SSN editors -

I will be unable to attend the meeting this week again (family commitments).
In lieu I've taken a look at the current draft FPWD. I have the following comments about the Future Work list:

1.      Does O&MLite/Prov-O alignment open up the possibility of adding the 'ActivityOfSensing' class to SSN? (And maybe re-considering the names of some classes.)

2.      No mention of sampling/sampling features.

On the latter, in many practical applications an explicit treatment of sampling features is very useful in clarifying what is really going on. Spatial sampling features (sites, transects, flight-lines, cruises, cross-sections, images, pixels, plots, stations etc.) are widely used, and have common properties, even if the names are discipline specific. OGC O&M has a model for these which attempts to put a uniform vocabulary over the various disciplinary terms. This has been raised a number of times, and I added it to the Wiki in all the relevant places, but the word 'sampling' doesn't (yet) appear in the draft.


From: Kerry Taylor [mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au]
Sent: Monday, 4 April 2016 11:36 PM
To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>>
Subject: [SDW] [SSN] Agenda for SSN telecon this week

This week there will be respective sub-group meetings in the agreed NEW  regular time slots.
For SSN this will be at Tuesday  5 April 2016 21:00 UTC, that is
Canberra 7am Wednesday
Los Angeles 2pm Tuesday
London 10pm Tuesday
Madrid 11pm Tuesday
Please check your local time here: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20160405T21&ah=1&msg=SSN%20Call 5 April 2016 21:00 UTC


1.       What does the FPWD look like? See [http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/]

2.       Editor responsibilities for drafting

3.       W3C TPAC and F2F in Lisbon. See https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings#TPAC_2015.2C_Lisbon

4.       Any other business

Please check https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:SSN-Telecon20160405 at the call time for updated dialin instructions.

Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2016 07:09:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:20 UTC