- From: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:04:36 +0000
- To: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHrFjc=jE7kUic6tWeHxU8UG1q7cwmiJ-8abUyXKoQf9T5yAMA@mail.gmail.com>
And as we all know about Dragons, there is nothing you can do other than fear them... Just live your lives hoping you are not unlucky... I suggest a similar approach - it's not our problem to reconcile false assertions, just be aware of their likelihood. On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 at 16:58 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote: > From discussions on yesterday's call: > > ---- > > BillRoberts sees this problem occur routinely. Statistical data (expressed > in RDF Data Cubes for example) often relates to geographic and > administrative areas. Many statistical datasets may use the same "spatial" > dataset. A common use case is to look for other statistics relating the > subject administrative area. > > Beware that there is no limit to how many times resources may have linked > to (referred to) a given subject area ... there may be thousands of > 'back-links'. How do we prioritise which ones to show/use? > > (BillRoberts says that the situation is quite easy if you have all the > necessary information in your triple-store - or even if you can federate > your query across a number of known SPARQL end-points. However, what about > the "unknowns" - how do you discover what else is "out there" that refers > to your subject? How do you find third party content? This is a > discoverability concern ['''see related theme "enabling discovery"''']) > > Is there a place for (domain-specific) catalogues where one can register > assertions about / references to a subject? For example [http://sameas.org > sameas.org] provides a place where owl:sameAs assertions can be > registered ... perhaps, say, data.gov.uk could allow open data publishers > to register information about resources that are identified in URISets in > the data.gov.uk domain??? > > (Ed notes that "there be dragons" when you're trying to reconcile > different statistical data that assert that they are (apparently) talking > about the same location or area ... ) > > On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 at 09:35 Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Email thread for collecting discussion on the question: "What else links >> to my subject of interest?" >> >> The related wiki entry for this questions is here [1] >> >> For instructions about how to engage with this discussion, please see my >> previous email [2]. >> >> Many thanks. Jeremy >> >> [1]: >> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Linking_Data#What_else_links_to_my_subject_of_interest.3F >> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Linking_Data#How_can_I_describe_links_in_my_format_of_choice.3F> >> >> [2]: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2015Sep/0044.html >> >> >> -- *Ed Parsons* Geospatial Technologist, Google Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 www.edparsons.com @edparsons
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 16:05:23 UTC