- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:22:48 +0200
- To: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFVDz4316WVszAY8q7tiyu6TkOew4+CJYAeP-_gP0068Tsd_rQ@mail.gmail.com>
An addition: I think the same goes for the temporal sister requirement: Temporal vagueness <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#TemporalVagueness> . Regards, Frans 2015-05-29 15:19 GMT+02:00 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>: > Hello Alejandro, > > I think I understand what the Spatial vagueness > <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#SpatialVagueness> > requirement ("It should be possible to describe locations in a vague, > imprecise manner.") is about. But I think that with the current phrasing it > will be hard to check whether our deliverables will meet this requirement. > In other words, I think the vagueness requirement is too vague :-). > > Perhaps we should add some examples of spatial vagueness that should be > possible to express as spatial data on the web? That could help in making > the requirement testable. > > Greetings, > Frans > > > -- > Frans Knibbe > Geodan > President Kennedylaan 1 > 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) > > T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 > E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl > www.geodan.nl > disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> > > -- Frans Knibbe Geodan President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 13:23:19 UTC