- From: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:37:47 +0200
- To: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABTzy2TuLxGueucBtyDps5=U54kG2XzigjLte7FvTZxYL7px5A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Frans, I used the verb "specify" to avoid being redundant, i.e. "reference the temporal reference system". I would be happy with "It should be possible to specify the temporal reference system used". Wrt your final proposal, I am not in favour of reqs. demanding for standards ;) Cheers, Alejandro On 28 May 2015 at 18:49, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote: > Hello Alejandro, > > The way the Temporal Reference System requirement > <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#TemporalReferenceSystem> > is phrased is not clear to me. It says "The temporal reference system > should be specified." It is not clear to me where the temporal reference > system should be specified. Surely not everywhere were temporal data occur? > > How about "it should be possible to reference the temporal reference > system used"? > > Or how about "There should be a standard for publishing data about > temporal reference systems. Those descriptions should be referencable by > HTTP URIs." ... this similar to the suggested phrasing of the CRS > requirement. > > Regards, > Frans > > > > -- > Frans Knibbe > Geodan > President Kennedylaan 1 > 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) > > T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 > E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl > www.geodan.nl > disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> > > -- Alejandro Llaves Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Artificial Intelligence Department Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Avda. Montepríncipe s/n Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves allaves@fi.upm.es
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 10:38:13 UTC